Our agronomy professor lost favour with me.
He sprung a little field trip on us. The day before two major anatomy exams. He had no interest in rescheduling, was kind of a dick about it actually. He insisted it would be mandatory and that there would be a roll (there wasn't). I suppose it might have been alright if it was a really good trip, but this is what happened:
We got on some grungy old buses, drove out to a little farm, and then stared at grass for four hours. Four. The professor waffled on about the pasture, and got the farmer to waffle on about farming, and we literally walked to a paddock or two and looked at the grass, while they talked about grass. The farmer's dog got the most attention out of all of them.
The professor's credibility got seriously undermined within the first twenty minutes by this gem of an exchange...
Prof: What do the vets do?
Farmer: They are involved with animal health, preventive care, calving problems.
Prof: What about the pasture? Do they help with pasture management?
Farmer: No, I have a farm consultant for that.
Monday, 19 September 2011
Tuesday, 16 August 2011
Professors: In-credible
One of our anatomy professors is a little suspicious. Fortunately he only gives one or two lectures a semester, and mostly he's just there to confuse people in lab. At first he made me scratch my head, but now he's lost most of his credibility.
The first hint that he is actually clueless was first year. We were learning the nerves of the hind limb, and there was an unlabeled prosection showing them very nicely. One of the nerves was wonky, nothing we'd learned about at the time, so we asked this guy what it was. He said it was the ischiatic nerve. It was actually the pudendal nerve. Now, if you don't know what those are, the ischiatic nerve goes down your leg. The pudendal nerve goes over the back of the pelvis. If you think about the way a dog is set up, that's like a ninety degree angle between the two, and they're not even close to each other. There's pretty much no way anyone could get them confused.
Since then, he has said a lot of things that made us wonder if he knows what he's talking about, but nothing really stood out to me until a few anatomy labs ago. This was one where we had live horses in stalls and were palpating muscles and ligaments in their front legs. There were four people to a horse, two to each leg.
The pair across from me and my partner comes over asking if we found the styloid processes. If you feel the two bumps on your wrist (especially the one on the outside that you can see and kind of defines the wrist), those are the ends of the radius and ulna, known as the styloid processes. Other mammals have the same thing. So I said yes, we had felt them, and the other pair says that this professor had told them they're not palpable. He'd told them that what they were, in fact, feeling was the epicondyles. Er... there are no epicondyles of the radius and ulna. They don't exist, they're not there. Epicondyles are the name for the bony protuberances in other bones, like humerus and femur. And seriously. You can feel your wrists. Horses are build the same way. The styloid processes are undeniably, obviously palpable.
However the best thing that happened was this. This isn't so much him getting anatomy blatantly wrong, as just going to show how little help he is.
On the upper forelimb, it's kind of hard to tell the muscles apart. There's a lot of them and they're somewhat confusing, so we got the nearest professor to come over and help us. Three guesses who.
So my partner asks him to clarify the muscles, and I bend down to show him which ones we think we can identify. Our horse is finicky about being touched in that area and also tired of being palpated for three hours, so she turns around and tries to bite me. All she managed to do was tap me with her nose since I was in a reasonably safe position. Since I wasn't facing her head and so didn't see that she was actually trying to bite me, my partner tells me to watch out.
Professor's answer to our question: "Watch your back first. ;)"
Then he leaves.
My partner looks at me. "I'm pretty sure I asked him the question," she says after a time.
Had to get another professor to explain the muscles to us.
The first hint that he is actually clueless was first year. We were learning the nerves of the hind limb, and there was an unlabeled prosection showing them very nicely. One of the nerves was wonky, nothing we'd learned about at the time, so we asked this guy what it was. He said it was the ischiatic nerve. It was actually the pudendal nerve. Now, if you don't know what those are, the ischiatic nerve goes down your leg. The pudendal nerve goes over the back of the pelvis. If you think about the way a dog is set up, that's like a ninety degree angle between the two, and they're not even close to each other. There's pretty much no way anyone could get them confused.
Since then, he has said a lot of things that made us wonder if he knows what he's talking about, but nothing really stood out to me until a few anatomy labs ago. This was one where we had live horses in stalls and were palpating muscles and ligaments in their front legs. There were four people to a horse, two to each leg.
The pair across from me and my partner comes over asking if we found the styloid processes. If you feel the two bumps on your wrist (especially the one on the outside that you can see and kind of defines the wrist), those are the ends of the radius and ulna, known as the styloid processes. Other mammals have the same thing. So I said yes, we had felt them, and the other pair says that this professor had told them they're not palpable. He'd told them that what they were, in fact, feeling was the epicondyles. Er... there are no epicondyles of the radius and ulna. They don't exist, they're not there. Epicondyles are the name for the bony protuberances in other bones, like humerus and femur. And seriously. You can feel your wrists. Horses are build the same way. The styloid processes are undeniably, obviously palpable.
However the best thing that happened was this. This isn't so much him getting anatomy blatantly wrong, as just going to show how little help he is.
On the upper forelimb, it's kind of hard to tell the muscles apart. There's a lot of them and they're somewhat confusing, so we got the nearest professor to come over and help us. Three guesses who.
So my partner asks him to clarify the muscles, and I bend down to show him which ones we think we can identify. Our horse is finicky about being touched in that area and also tired of being palpated for three hours, so she turns around and tries to bite me. All she managed to do was tap me with her nose since I was in a reasonably safe position. Since I wasn't facing her head and so didn't see that she was actually trying to bite me, my partner tells me to watch out.
Professor's answer to our question: "Watch your back first. ;)"
Then he leaves.
My partner looks at me. "I'm pretty sure I asked him the question," she says after a time.
Had to get another professor to explain the muscles to us.
Friday, 12 August 2011
Avian Anatomy
Our last anatomy lab was on avian anatomy, so we dissected chickens. Here is an account of some of the things I thought were interesting.
You'd be surprised how few feathers they actually have. When they're alive they're all poofy, but for dissecting they had us dip them in soapy water so that feathers wouldn't be floating everywhere all lab (I'm serious), and you can really see that there's not as many as you'd think.
Birds have a super massive keel on their bellies, part of their sternum. Imagine your sternum down your chest, but with a big fin. Most of their bones are the same as mammals, but lots of things are fused. Most of their vertebral column is fused, which gives them stability and allows them to have less back muscles, which makes them lighter. The wishbone is their clavicle. Another interesting bony structure is the bone in their tongue--they don't have tongue muscles; the movement is conducted through their tongue bone.
Birds have a different voice organ than mammals, called the syrinx (we use our larynx). Something interesting I read is that songbirds and such that make a lot of complex sounds don't necessarily have a more developed syrinx or associated muscles.
Their brains are tiny, which I'm sure you already knew. What you might have not known is that their eyes are huge, way bigger than they appear because they aren't a sphere. Each eye is about the same size as the brain. Also their skull is kind of thick too, so if you're just looking at a bird and try to picture the size of their brain in their head, it's actually way, way smaller than you'd think just by doing that. They can have pretty super vision, but I don't think their brains do a whole lot else for them.
Birds don't have a diaphragm: they depend on moving their body wall to draw air into their lungs. So if you hold a bird so it can't move it's chest, it won't be able to breathe. They also have a pretty cool system, where air gets drawn into these air sacs and then into the lungs and then into other air sacs before being exhaled, so that the air going into the lungs is always fresh. Being so efficient is why they can fly very high, where the oxygen is low.
Their gastrointestinal, urinary, and reproductive tracts all open into this one pouch and exit the bird through the same hole. They sort of have two stomachs--one that's glandular, and one that's super muscular (the gizzard). That's kind of neat because it actually utilises ingested stones to help grind up food. Their testicles don't descend (they stay inside the abdomen), and sometimes the only way to sex a bird might be using internal imaging. They also don't have a bladder.
If you look at the ovary, you can see a bunch of big red follicles, like the ones that will be tomorrow's egg and the next day's. They're super huge! And if you break one by accident, you get yolk everywhere. In our bird, it had actually had a ruptured part of its reproductive tract, so there was an egg that hadn't got its shell yet, and it was just hanging out inside the bird. It looked just like it would have if you'd cracked one and dropped it in.
The nerve that innervates their hind limbs passes over the kidney, so if they have kidney disease or a tumour or something, it can actually present as lameness.
Perching is a passive thing. When they bend their knees, it tenses the tendons that flex their digits, causing them to grip. It takes no energy for them to sit there gripping a branch, and if you want to un-perch them you have to straighten their legs.
Some birds, such as owls, have asymmetric ears so they can localise sound better. Also, birds have magnetite in their beak and neck muscles, which is an iron rich crystal that responds to the Earth's magnetic field. This gives them both directional and geographical location information.
Those are all the cool facts about birds I can think of for now, I hope you learned something.
You'd be surprised how few feathers they actually have. When they're alive they're all poofy, but for dissecting they had us dip them in soapy water so that feathers wouldn't be floating everywhere all lab (I'm serious), and you can really see that there's not as many as you'd think.
Birds have a super massive keel on their bellies, part of their sternum. Imagine your sternum down your chest, but with a big fin. Most of their bones are the same as mammals, but lots of things are fused. Most of their vertebral column is fused, which gives them stability and allows them to have less back muscles, which makes them lighter. The wishbone is their clavicle. Another interesting bony structure is the bone in their tongue--they don't have tongue muscles; the movement is conducted through their tongue bone.
Birds have a different voice organ than mammals, called the syrinx (we use our larynx). Something interesting I read is that songbirds and such that make a lot of complex sounds don't necessarily have a more developed syrinx or associated muscles.
Their brains are tiny, which I'm sure you already knew. What you might have not known is that their eyes are huge, way bigger than they appear because they aren't a sphere. Each eye is about the same size as the brain. Also their skull is kind of thick too, so if you're just looking at a bird and try to picture the size of their brain in their head, it's actually way, way smaller than you'd think just by doing that. They can have pretty super vision, but I don't think their brains do a whole lot else for them.
Birds don't have a diaphragm: they depend on moving their body wall to draw air into their lungs. So if you hold a bird so it can't move it's chest, it won't be able to breathe. They also have a pretty cool system, where air gets drawn into these air sacs and then into the lungs and then into other air sacs before being exhaled, so that the air going into the lungs is always fresh. Being so efficient is why they can fly very high, where the oxygen is low.
Their gastrointestinal, urinary, and reproductive tracts all open into this one pouch and exit the bird through the same hole. They sort of have two stomachs--one that's glandular, and one that's super muscular (the gizzard). That's kind of neat because it actually utilises ingested stones to help grind up food. Their testicles don't descend (they stay inside the abdomen), and sometimes the only way to sex a bird might be using internal imaging. They also don't have a bladder.
If you look at the ovary, you can see a bunch of big red follicles, like the ones that will be tomorrow's egg and the next day's. They're super huge! And if you break one by accident, you get yolk everywhere. In our bird, it had actually had a ruptured part of its reproductive tract, so there was an egg that hadn't got its shell yet, and it was just hanging out inside the bird. It looked just like it would have if you'd cracked one and dropped it in.
The nerve that innervates their hind limbs passes over the kidney, so if they have kidney disease or a tumour or something, it can actually present as lameness.
Perching is a passive thing. When they bend their knees, it tenses the tendons that flex their digits, causing them to grip. It takes no energy for them to sit there gripping a branch, and if you want to un-perch them you have to straighten their legs.
Some birds, such as owls, have asymmetric ears so they can localise sound better. Also, birds have magnetite in their beak and neck muscles, which is an iron rich crystal that responds to the Earth's magnetic field. This gives them both directional and geographical location information.
Those are all the cool facts about birds I can think of for now, I hope you learned something.
Sunday, 7 August 2011
You Have Been Warned
Last semester marked the end of general anatomy, though we still have comparative anatomy this semester. Having done the musculoskeletal system and thorax in first year, that left the head and abdomen. The division of learning was interesting: out of ten labs, seven were on the head, and three were on everything else.
I'm not sure who thought that was the best idea. If you ask me, they could probably have just made some sort of neuroanatomy/neurophysiology course to take the place of one of our useless ones (because sadly we have several that are a complete waste of time). It would seem to me that the abdomen is pretty important--think about how much a vet has to work with it, between the stomach and intestines, kidneys and bladder, and urogenital system. I'd imagine we're going to see a lot of spays/neuters, dogs swallowing things they shouldn't, horses with colic (abdominal pain), cats with urinary tract diseases, and everything else you can think of. Yet for some reason our learning of the anatomy of those things was all in one lab.
The last lab was so huge, in fact, that there was a giant warning page at the beginning of the preparation section and the dissection instructions. It very disapprovingly states that if you've gotten into the habit of not finishing, or even starting, the preparation sections, you had better get your act together because this module 10 is intense. It makes a point of reminding everyone that if you don't complete the preparation section and you get caught, you'll fail the lab.
Note: Writing this now since starting comparative anatomy, and looking at last semester's lab book, it saddens me to notice that lab 10 in it's massive enormity of reading, questions, and dissection, is still smaller than the work required for comparative anatomy. The first lab was 30 pages. The second lab was 40.
I'm not sure who thought that was the best idea. If you ask me, they could probably have just made some sort of neuroanatomy/neurophysiology course to take the place of one of our useless ones (because sadly we have several that are a complete waste of time). It would seem to me that the abdomen is pretty important--think about how much a vet has to work with it, between the stomach and intestines, kidneys and bladder, and urogenital system. I'd imagine we're going to see a lot of spays/neuters, dogs swallowing things they shouldn't, horses with colic (abdominal pain), cats with urinary tract diseases, and everything else you can think of. Yet for some reason our learning of the anatomy of those things was all in one lab.
The last lab was so huge, in fact, that there was a giant warning page at the beginning of the preparation section and the dissection instructions. It very disapprovingly states that if you've gotten into the habit of not finishing, or even starting, the preparation sections, you had better get your act together because this module 10 is intense. It makes a point of reminding everyone that if you don't complete the preparation section and you get caught, you'll fail the lab.
Note: Writing this now since starting comparative anatomy, and looking at last semester's lab book, it saddens me to notice that lab 10 in it's massive enormity of reading, questions, and dissection, is still smaller than the work required for comparative anatomy. The first lab was 30 pages. The second lab was 40.
Saturday, 6 August 2011
Slave Auction
As part of the fundraising for their halfway day--the day that is exactly half way through their degree, and they go off skydiving and partying and stuff like that--every year the third years hold a slave auction. At this event, groups of third year vets perform talent acts and then you can bid on them. If you win a group of slaves, you get them for two hours worth of work. The advertisements suggested having them clean your flat or be your best friend at a party and make you look cool. It is traditional for the other years to chip in and buy a set of slaves.
The average price for slaves was about $200, and they ranged between $100-$300. Everyone in our class gave the class rep $2, so with 100 people in our class that was just enough to buy one set of slaves. Our plan was to have them clean up after the First Year-Second Year party (that didn't actually happen so I'm not sure what we'll use them for). We kept getting outbid, and just barely managed to snag the last group for sale.
Most of the groups just did dances. One of them poked fun at our professors with rewritten lyrics. My favorite group was one that dressed in black morph suits, turned out the lights, and had glowsticks taped to their bodies in a stick figure shape. My second favorite was a bunch of people dressed up like cookie monster. I particularly liked this one because they had a huge amount of homemade cookies that they kept throwing into the audience. I got one.
One of the groups that didn't do a dance had this idea to sweeten the deal. You see, if you bid on them, you also got to take home your very own prosthetic leg. One of the bidders was a guy with crutches.
Another set of slaves was in the form of a barbershop quartet.
And, because it wouldn't be a vet event without random nudity, the audience somehow coerced the MC into taking his clothes off. I think that happened because the last set of slaves, a group of four guys, had already gotten some clothes off: when the bidding petered out, they kept offering to remove something if someone made a higher bid. Yeah, those were the ones we won.
The average price for slaves was about $200, and they ranged between $100-$300. Everyone in our class gave the class rep $2, so with 100 people in our class that was just enough to buy one set of slaves. Our plan was to have them clean up after the First Year-Second Year party (that didn't actually happen so I'm not sure what we'll use them for). We kept getting outbid, and just barely managed to snag the last group for sale.
Most of the groups just did dances. One of them poked fun at our professors with rewritten lyrics. My favorite group was one that dressed in black morph suits, turned out the lights, and had glowsticks taped to their bodies in a stick figure shape. My second favorite was a bunch of people dressed up like cookie monster. I particularly liked this one because they had a huge amount of homemade cookies that they kept throwing into the audience. I got one.
One of the groups that didn't do a dance had this idea to sweeten the deal. You see, if you bid on them, you also got to take home your very own prosthetic leg. One of the bidders was a guy with crutches.
Another set of slaves was in the form of a barbershop quartet.
And, because it wouldn't be a vet event without random nudity, the audience somehow coerced the MC into taking his clothes off. I think that happened because the last set of slaves, a group of four guys, had already gotten some clothes off: when the bidding petered out, they kept offering to remove something if someone made a higher bid. Yeah, those were the ones we won.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)